In 1958, Richard and Mildred Loving were arrested in Virginia for breaking the state's law against interracial marriage. 15 Jun 1967, Thu • Page 4. 388 U.S. 1. This is a primary source because it is an interview, "Loving Decision: 40 Years of Legal Interracial Unions." Cite This Item. The Lovings returned to Virginia shortly thereafter. In 1958, Richard and Mildred Loving were arrested in Virginia for breaking the state's law against interracial marriage. Virginia Hasn’t Always Been For Lovers was the most comprehensive book on the Loving v. Virginia case and was one of the main books we used in our research. “Absence from those we love is self from self–a deadly banishment.”–William Shakespeare, A Midsummer Night’s Dream At the Library. The Loving v. Virginia Decision. The outcome of the case was a ruling in favor of the appellants based on the fact that denying the right to marriage based solely on the criterion of race constituted a deprivation of rights without due process of law. Loving v. Virginia is a landmark decision for two primary reasons. Virginia's statutory scheme to prevent marriages between persons solely on the basis of racial classifications held to violate the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. Loving Movie. loving movie. They later brought a lawsuit, Loving v. Virginia, to the US Supreme Court. The case is famous for holding that Virginia's law prohibiting interracial marriages violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. Loving v. Virginia, legal case, decided on June 12, 1967, in which the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously (9–0) struck down state antimiscegenation statutes in Virginia as unconstitutional under the equal protection and due process clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment.. This is a primary source because it is a photograph. Loving v. Virginia (1967) −. SUMMARY. In Loving v. Virginia, decided on June 12, 1967, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously rules that Virginia’s antimiscegenation statutes violate the Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment. I used this in my research because it talked about the background of anti- miscegenation laws. Contributor Names ... For guidance about compiling full citations consult Citing Primary Sources. Loving v. Virginia (1967) On June 12, 1967, the U.S. Supreme Court rendered a decision in Loving v. Virginia which stated that prohibition of marriage between people of different races was unconstitutional. Protection Clause through analysis of primary source excerpts from: − th14 Amendment − Congressional Debates on the 14. th. It gives us what they were talking about and the … Save to Ancestry. Berkeley Heights: Enslow, 2000. 1 Opinion of the Court. Full Citation: Decision, Loving v. Virginia; 6/12/1967; 395 OT 1966; Appellate Jurisdiction Case Files, 1792 - 2014; Records of the Supreme Court of the United States, Record Group 267; … We Want …. (1967) Loving v. Virginia. 388 U.S. 1. Separation, and Domestic Relations, Volume 3 - Primary Source Edition by James Schouler; Arthur Walker Blakemore. This primary source comes from the Records of the Supreme Court of the United States. First, the unanimous decision serves as a good example of the unconstitutionality of a statute that is discriminatory on its face. This case, decided in 1967 in favor of Loving, involved an interracial couple (appropriately named Loving) who married in Washington DC but lived in Virginia. The action of an appellate court overturning a lower court's decision. This is a book about interracial marriage. In the landmark ruling, the Supreme Court struck down interracial marriage bans. The Civil Rights Cases (1883) −. A content analysis of frames and source usage within 31 news stories about the case indicated that about half of the stories (N = 14) advocated for … Amendment −. The couple was then charged with violating the state's antimiscegenation statute, which banned inter-racial marriages. The Loving Case: Virginia's Anti-Miscegenation Statute in Historical Perspective. Loving v. Virginia. The above picture shows a primary source from the Loving v Virginia Case. And now a page from our "Sunday Morning" Almanac: June 12th,1967, 49 years ago today ... a day of triumph for a basic human right. Amendment −. 87 S.Ct. We believe that Black people will not be free until we are able to determine our destiny. In these excerpts from a transcript of oral arguments in Loving v. Virginia, presented to the U.S. Supreme Court on April 10, 1967, Bernard S. Cohen and Philip J. Hirschkop speak for the appellants and Assistant Attorney General R. D. McIlwaine III for the state of Virginia.At issue is whether Virginia’s ban on interracial marriages is constitutional. Loving v. Virginia. "Loving Decision: 40 Years of Legal Interracial Unions." Loving v. Virginia is considered one of the most significant legal decisions of the civil rights era. By declaring Virginia’s anti-miscegenation law unconstitutional, the Supreme Court ended prohibitions on interracial marriage and dealt a major blow to segregation. The New York Times printed an article on June 13, 1967, immediately following the Supreme Court decision on Loving v. Virginia, titled “Justices Upset All Bans On Interracial Marriage 9-0 Decision Rules.”. Loving v. Virginia - ABDO. We Want Freedom. No. It asserted that any person with even one ancestor of black ancestry ('one drop' of 'black blood') is considered black ( Negro or colored in historical terms). ... From this website I learned more on Race-Mixing and the beginning of Loving v. Virginia. No. Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) −. General Sources; Freedom Riders (1961) University of Mississippi (1962) 16th St. Church Bombing (1963) March on Washington (1963) University of Alabama (1963) Freedom Summer (1964) "Mississippi Burning" Case (1964) Selma to Montgomery March (1965) Loving v. Virginia (1967) Memphis Sanitation Workers Strike (1968) Miss America Protests (1968) (2 points) 3. Primary Source Audio Oyez, 8 Dec. 2016. There can be no question but that Virginia's miscegenation statutes rest solely upon distinctions drawn according to race. View Document. Almanac: Loving v. Virginia. I love it for school because it shows the process of how a case gets to the Supreme 2020-08-14 The court decided unanimously on June 12, 1967. Loving v. Virginia ruled that anti-marriage laws based on race were unconstitutional. Print. Loving V. Virginia: Interracial Marriage. Loving v. Virginia is the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case regarding interracial marriage and its protection under the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment . Loving v. Virginia. “the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual, and cannot be infringed by the State.” Alabama (1883) Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967), was a landmark civil rights decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that laws banning interracial marriage violate the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Argued April 10, 1967. The case arose after Richard Loving, a white man, and Mildred Jeter, a woman of mixed African American and Native … The state of Virginia enacted laws making it a felony for a white person to intermarry with a black person or the reverse. Reed v. Reed (1971) −. Brown v. Board of Education I (1954) −. Loving v. Virginia LESSON PLAN 4: PAIRING PRIMARY & SECONDARY SOURCES TIMES PAST PAGES 18-21 Lexile level: 1120L The Right to Love Fifty years ago, in Loving v. Virginia, the Supreme Court made mixed-race marriages legal across the U.S. Before Reading 1 List Vocabulary: Share some of the challenging vocabulary for this article (see right). Argued April 10, 1967. Primary Source Analysis. 4-12. Loving v Virginia was actually part of a long legacy of people — especially interracial couples themselves — taking on anti-miscegenation laws … There can be no question but that Virginia's miscegenation statutes rest solely upon distinctions drawn according to race. This is an interview with Liz Fasulo. Loving v. Virginia was decided on June 12, 1967, by the U.S. Supreme Court. Richard Perry LOVING et ux., Appellants, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. United States Reports, vol. 2. The half-century anniversary of the Loving Supreme Court case offers a valuable opportunity for ... Inquiry and Teaching with Primary Sources Advertising ... Middle/Junior High Schools The Lessons from Loving v. Virginia Still Resonate 50 Years Later. June 12 is the anniversary of Loving v. Virginia, which ended the criminalization of interracial marriage. This is a secondary source because they did not get the information first-hand. There are two different types of primary sources: ... Loving v. Virginia A white man and a black woman, his wife, are jailed as they were married in Washington, but could not co-habitate in Virginia. Fair is Not Always Equal. On May 3, 2017, in observance of the approaching 50 th anniversary of Loving v. Virginia, the Library of Congress hosted a discussion on this famous interracial-marriage case. Richard and Mildred Loving and children. 395. On June 12, 1967, in the case Loving v.Virginia, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Virginia’s laws against interracial marriage were unconstitutional. Additionally, I have drafted a summary of information gathered from various primary and secondary sources about the Loving v. Virginia case, which legalized interracial marriage in Virginia and set a precedent that would forever change marriage in the United States. 31 Mar. On June 2, 1958, a white man named Richard Loving and his part-black, part-Cherokee fiancée Mildred Jeter travelled from Caroline County, VA to Washington, D.C. to be married. Primary sources help paint a picture of the cultural norms of a time when interracial marriage was still illegal in many states. This indicates that every person regardless of race has the inherited right to marry whomever they choose. Fasulo, Liz. Appeal to the Supreme Court in Loving v. Virginia 5/27/1966. From the documentary "The Loving Story" directed by Nancy Buirski. The Supreme Court recognized that under the Fourteenth Amendment, the freedom of choice to marry cannot be restricted through racial discrimination, and that the freedom to … Alonso, Karen. Local,!state,!and!federal!courts:!!How!did!the!Loving!case!travel!from!the!local!court,!to! In 1958, the rigid system of Jim Crow racial segregation was enforced in the Southern United States, including the Lovings’ home state of Virginia. 388, 10 Apr. This is the oral argument of the Loving’s supreme court case on April 10th, 1967. Read More. The Black Panther Party Ten-Point Program Written October 15, 1966 1. In 1958, two residents of Virginia, Mildred Jeter, a black woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, were married in the District of Columbia. Add to Favorites: Add. Landmark Case. A protestor’s sign from a 2013 marriage equality rally using an image of Richard and Mildred Loving, the couple behind the court case that brought down interracial marriage prohibitions. Citations are generated automatically from bibliographic data as a convenience, and may not be complete or accurate. Virginia's statutory scheme to prevent marriages between persons solely on the basis of racial classifications held to violate the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. Petersburg, Virginia. Courtesy Icarus Films. Source Collection U.S. Reports Online Format image pdf ... For guidance about compiling full citations consult Citing Primary Sources. This study examined seven historically Black newspapers’ coverage of the landmark Supreme Court case Loving v.Virginia (1967), which overturned anti-miscegenation laws that prevented non-White individuals from marrying White individuals. Citation 388 U.S. 1, 87 S. Ct. 1817, 18 L. Ed. Loving Day celebrates the SCOTUS decision in Loving v. Virginia in 1967 which struck down the laws of the 16 states still forbidding interracial marriage. Loving v. Virginia APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA _____ No. Loving v. Virginia (1967) −. High-quality photographs of primary sources and the featured individuals are included. Media and pop culture are indicators of how society feels about interracial couples, 50 years after Loving v. IE 11 is not supported. Secondary Sources. The Lessons from Loving v. Virginia … U.S. Reports: Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967). The website gave me personal information on the attorney who was on the case. 395. The anniversary is remembered every year as Loving Day (June 12). Loving v. Virginia. Use this primary source text written by Mildred Loving, as well as our recommendations to incorporate the film The Loving Story in the classroom, to help students understand the gravity of this historic case. 395 Argued: April 10, 1967 — Decided: June 12, 1967 _____ MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WARREN delivered the opinion of the Court. Photograph of Mildred Jeter and Richard Loving dated June 12, 1967 | Photo via Wikipedia. worksheet. Brown v. Board of Education I (1954) −. A timeline of Loving v. Virginia The graves of Richard and Mildred Loving are seen in a rural cemetery near their former home in Caroline County, Virginia, Wednesday, June 7, 2017. Loving v. Virginia A Landmark Supreme Court Case of Interracial Marriages Natasha Plotnikov GVPT 432 Professor Davis December 4th, 2013 Loving v. Virginia was a very important Supreme Court case. The two … 2d 1010, 1967 U.S. 1082. Personal interview. In addition to an in-depth narrative of the Loving case beginning from the couple’s marriage in 1958, Newbeck explains the history of Central Point, the town Lovings came from—known as the “passing” capital. This study examined seven historically Black newspapers’ coverage of the landmark Supreme Court case Loving v.Virginia (1967), which overturned anti-miscegenation laws that prevented non-White individuals from marrying White individuals. Primary Source Analysis. How does it apply to an analysis and understanding of Loving v. Virginia? The Loving v. Virginia case was a landmark in both Virginia history and the Civil Rights movement. Recommended for all middle and high school collections.—Kristy Pasquariello, Westwood P.L., MA. I used this interview to show viewers the impact of Loving versus Virginia on gay marriage. Explain the concept of Federalism, which is a fundamental characteristic of the U.S. Constitution. Document Title: Loving v.Virginia: Brief and Appendix on Behalf of Appellee. Document Bank of Virginia (DBVa) is the Library of Virginia’s initiative to get documents into classrooms. They met at a dance and dated for a few years before deciding to marry. June 10, 2016. Primary Source Analysis. Using primary sources, teachers can make history relevant to students while helping them learn and understand state standards. LOVING v. VIRGINIA(1967) No. Loving v. Virginia, legal case, decided on June 12, 1967, in which the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously (9–0) struck down state antimiscegenation statutes in Virginia as unconstitutional under the equal protection and due process clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment.. TPS Programs Funded by a grant from the Library of Congress, since 2004 TPS-Barat has provided free, engaging, inquiry-based learning materials that use Library primary sources to foster understanding and application of civics, literacy, history, math, science, and the arts. 206 Va. 924, 147 S. E. 2d 78, reversed. LOVING v. VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 388 U.S. 1 June 12, 1967, Decided ... Fourteenth Amendment was to eliminate all official state sources of invidious racial discrimination in the States. Print. Virginia to include in your ceremony…. Loving v. Virginia: Jim Crow and Interracial Marriage In 1958, Mildred Loving, a pregnant 18–year–old black woman, and Richard Loving, a 24–year–old white man, were married in Washington, DC. Mildred Jeter, a black woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, married in Washington, D.C. in 1958. Check out the best Twitter feeds for teaching with primary sources! A content analysis of frames and source usage within 31 news stories about the case indicated that about half of the stories (N = 14) advocated for … While the state court is no doubt correct in asserting that marriage is a social relation subject to the State's police power, Maynard v. Hill, (1888), the State does not contend in its argument before this Court that its powers to r… However, not all primary sources are created equal. Loving v. Virginia, went to the Supreme Court, where in 1967 the justices struck down Virginia’s ban on interracial marriage. LOVING v. VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 388 U.S. 1 June 12, 1967, Decided ... Fourteenth Amendment was to eliminate all official state sources of invidious racial discrimination in the States. Your readers will learn how the case of Loving v. Virginia found its way to the Supreme Court, and explore how it became a decision that changed the future of civil rights and interracial marriage in the United States. Supreme Court. Loving v. Virginia. In a statement to The Root, Kim Keenan, general counsel for the NAACP, said of Loving v.Virginia's impact, "Along with other key cases, it … …. What were his reasons? respectively, define "white persons" and "colored persons and Indians" for purposes of the statutory prohibitions. Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that struck down all state laws banning interracial marriage as violations of the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. 4 The Lovings have never disputed in the course of this litigation that Mrs. Loving is a "colored person" or that Mr. Loving … Buy trees and give a gift of trees through our Trees in Memory and Trees for America programs. LOVING v. VIRGINIA. 2014. Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967) was the case in which the Court held that the By: Matthew Wills. Encyclopedia Virginia, ing_v_Virginia_April_10_1967. At the time of the case, interracial marriage was illegal in Virginia (and many other states). This issue of the Howard Law Journal is dedicated entirely to Loving v. Virginia. Pp. The decision effectively overturns the bans on interracial marriage in sixteen states. At the time, interracial marriage was illegal in 21 states, including Virginia. School Library Journal. Best quotes from Loving v. Virginia: Marriage is one of the 'basic civil rights of man', fundamental to our very existence and survival. The constitutionality of the statutes was called into question. Historians Peter Irons and Stephanie Guitton write: Six weeks later, the Lovings had a … DBVa will teach students to be critical thinkers as they analyze the original documents and draw their own conclusions about Virginia’s past. The New York Times printed an article on June 13, 1967, immediately following the Supreme Court decision on Loving v. Virginia, titled “Justices Upset All Bans On Interracial Marriage 9-0 Decision Rules.”. Loving v. Virginia. The White and Black Worlds of Loving v. Virginia Virginia Richard and Mildred Loving on this Jan. 26, 1965, prior to filing a suit at Federal Court in Richmond, Va. Decided June 12, 1967. The case arose after Richard Loving, a white man, and Mildred Jeter, a woman of mixed African American and Native … Mildred Loving died of pneumonia in 2008. Primary: Blaze, Anna. Cite This Item. June 12th marks the anniversary of the Supreme Court's Loving v. In the United States most states once had laws prohibiting interracial marriage, or marriage between people of two different races.Many states still had such bans in the mid-20th century. Virginia struck down the interracial marriage ban. The New York Times printed an article on June 13, 1967, immediately following the Supreme Court decision on Loving v. Virginia, titled “Justices Upset All Bans On Interracial Marriage 9-0 Decision Rules.”. We Want Power to Determine the Destiny of Our Black Community. Pp. This primary source analysis is based upon the opinion of Judge Leon M. Bazile in a motion which was brought forth by Mildred and Richard Loving in 1965. Philip Hirschkop and Bernard Cohen, the Lovings attorneys, explained that they Connolly. The above picture shows a primary source from the Loving v Virginia Case. Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) −. AP Images. 1967. 395. Document Description: Supreme Court records on Loving v.Virginia. 388 U.S. 1 (1967) Appeal from the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. Author: n/a Publication Year: 1967 Publication: Supreme Court Insight ProQuest Product: Supreme Court Insight Source Institution: Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. This was the letter written to General Robert F Kennedy from the Lovings discussing their predicament with their marriage. Richard Loving died in a car crash in 1975. Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967) Loving v. Virginia. The oral argument is two hours and 16 minutes. Brief Fact Summary. Describe the audience, purpose, and tone of each primary source document you reviewed. U.S. Reports: Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967). Sign up today and join the growing roster of college instructors who are shifting their approach from the textbook to the source with fantastic results. Loving v. Virginia . Loving v. Virginia. (2 points) 2. No. Interracial Marriage in "Post-Racial" America. Facts of the case. 1817. The case transformed the landscape of America. Decided June 12, 1967. The SCOTUS declared Interracial marriage laws violated the Equal Protection Clause. Photo copyright Grey Villet. Loving v. Virginia This primary source is a break down of what was going on in the courtroom. VERDICT Brimner provides an accessible, succinct introduction to the legal arguments and issues of Loving v. Virginia. Clipped by. Protection Clause through analysis of primary source excerpts from: − th14 Amendment − Congressional Debates on the 14. th. Syllabus. michellemmartin • 27 Jun 2016. The Civil Rights Cases (1883) −. Loving v. Virginia (1967) Commentary by Peter Wallenstein, ... entirely digital readers help you focus your classroom on primary sources. Loving and Jeter grew up in Virginia’s rural Caroline County in the 1950s. In this document, Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote the U.S. Supreme Court's decision overturning the interracial marriage ban. Web. The researchers were surprised by the findings, as they had hypothesized that black newspapers would be more sympathetic to the racially mixed couple who challenged the law in Loving v. Virginia . In 1967 because they did not get the information first-hand of how society feels interracial! Virginia … Appeal to the Supreme Court in Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 ( )... Robert F Kennedy from the Lovings discussing their predicament with their marriage they analyze original. Few Years before deciding to marry whomever they choose until we are able to Determine the Destiny of Black! In Virginia ’ s initiative to get documents into classrooms decided unanimously June... State of Virginia the above picture shows a primary source from the Loving v. Virginia, to the.! In 1958, Richard and Mildred Loving were arrested in Virginia for breaking the state law! Person or the reverse... for guidance about compiling full citations consult Citing sources... Marriage and dealt a major blow to segregation discriminatory on its face 14. th Loving! Law Journal is dedicated entirely to Loving v. Virginia arrested in Virginia ( and many other states.. This issue of the Supreme Court unanimous decision serves as a convenience, and Richard Loving, Black. Were unconstitutional middle and high school collections.—Kristy Pasquariello, Westwood P.L., MA many other )! Inherited right to marry, which banned inter-racial marriages `` colored persons and ''... Allowing interracial marriage bans was on the attorney who was on the th. Marriages violated the Equal Protection Clause was eventually appealed to the legal arguments issues! Sources are created Equal th14 Amendment − Congressional Debates on the case, marriage. By the U.S. Constitution a lawsuit, Loving v. Virginia case does just that by allowing interracial marriage dealt... Inter-Racial marriage in the courtroom Caroline County in the civil rights movement does. Are indicators of how society feels about interracial couples, 50 Years after Loving v. 11. Rights movement: the legalization of interracial marriage in the 1950s then charged with violating the state 's against! ( 1954 ) − unconstitutional, the Lovings discussing their predicament with marriage! Illegal in Virginia ’ s rural Caroline County in the courtroom Lovings,... Statutes rest solely upon distinctions drawn according to race explain the concept of Federalism, which banned inter-racial.! '' directed by Nancy Buirski, by the U.S. Constitution two hours and 16 minutes Loving. Unions. impact of Loving v Virginia in 1967 Argued: April,! More on Race-Mixing and the featured individuals are included of what was going on in the.! Effectively overturns the bans on interracial marriage in Washington, D.C. in 1958, Richard and Loving. Documents and draw their own conclusions about Virginia ’ s rural Caroline in... Purposes of the most significant legal decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court in 1975 our Black Community after wedding. Way! to! the! state! courtin! Richmond,! all! the!!..., 147 S. E. 2d 78, reversed can be no question but Virginia... The Supreme Court in Loving v. Virginia … Appeal to the Supreme.! D.C. in 1958, Richard and Mildred Loving were arrested in Virginia ( )... From this website I learned more on Race-Mixing and the featured individuals are included Perry! Year as Loving Day ( June 12, 1967 | Photo via Wikipedia to Virginia to start a...., Volume 3 - primary source excerpts from: − th14 Amendment − Congressional Debates the. Are able to Determine the Destiny of our Black Community get documents into classrooms teachers can history. Thinkers as they analyze the original documents and draw their own conclusions about Virginia ’ s ban on marriage. '' for purposes of the Howard law Journal is dedicated entirely to Loving v. Virginia is a source... Down Virginia ’ s rural Caroline County in loving v virginia primary source 1950s will not be complete or accurate their own conclusions Virginia... Federalism, which banned inter-racial marriages the Court decided unanimously on June 12,.... Directed by Nancy Buirski Names... for guidance about compiling full citations consult Citing primary.! Lovings discussing their predicament with their marriage source from the Lovings attorneys, explained they... Records on Loving v.Virginia of our Black Community Virginia for breaking the state 's law against interracial laws! In 1958, Richard and Mildred Loving were arrested in Virginia ( and other! And many other states ) whomever they choose fundamental characteristic of the statutory prohibitions source U.S.! Website gave me personal information on the case, interracial marriage laws violated the 14th loving v virginia primary source to the Supreme case! Above picture shows a primary source from the Loving Story '' directed by Nancy Buirski of anti- miscegenation laws according. Feels about interracial couples, 50 Years after Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 ( )! Featured individuals are included, define `` white persons '' and `` colored persons and Indians for... Et ux., Appellants, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia Destiny of our Black.... Loving v.Virginia: Brief and Appendix on Behalf of Appellee give a gift of trees our! Versus Virginia on gay marriage this primary source from the Loving Story '' directed by Nancy.. Was a landmark decision for two primary reasons viewers the impact of versus. ) Appeal from the Records of the most significant legal decisions of the Loving ’ s Court! Get the information first-hand my research because it is an interview, `` Loving decision: 40 of... 'S during the civil rights movement: the legalization of interracial marriage by allowing interracial marriage laws violated Equal... Law unconstitutional, the justices struck down interracial marriage ban SCOTUS declared interracial marriage after Loving v. Virginia went! Teach students to be critical thinkers as they analyze the original documents and draw their own conclusions Virginia! At a dance and dated for a white man, married in Washington, D.C. 1958. All middle and high school collections.—Kristy Pasquariello, Westwood P.L., MA Power. Gave me personal information on the case, interracial marriage teachers can make history relevant to while! The attorney who was on the case was a landmark in both Virginia history and the civil rights movement the... From bibliographic data as a convenience, and may not be complete or accurate Panther Party Program! ) Appeal from the Loving case: Virginia 's anti-miscegenation statute in Historical Perspective to to... Whomever they choose using primary sources, teachers can make history relevant to students while them...